A formal deal was concluded with the Cash Cartel user under the terms specified in the thread and confirmed by both parties. The terms explicitly mention his Telegram account, and he confirmed his agreement to all terms of the deal.
According to the agreement, he agreed to transfer funds to the cards I provided, with the profit split 30% between me and 70% between him. He also specified that he would transfer an amount up to 40% of the deposit placed with the guarantor.
After I deposited 10,000 USDT with the guarantor, he informed me on Saturday that the workday was over and they were closed on Sunday, and they wouldn't be able to start until Monday. Today, when I announced I was ready to start working, he blocked me on Telegram and removed me from the group.
He then told the guarantor that the Telegram account specified in the terms and conditions didn't belong to him and that I had allegedly been communicating with a fake account. This statement is untrue.
If the said Telegram really did not belong to him, he was obliged to:
However, he officially confirmed the deal. Once confirmed, he assumes full responsibility for the contact information provided. Referring to a "fake account" after blocking and disclaiming obligations appears to be an attempt to evade the terms of the deal.
The fact that he was blocked, removed from the group, and refused to work confirms the dishonesty of his actions.
I request the arbitration court to:
- recognize the fact of the confirmed transaction;
- take into account the blocking and evasion of fulfillment of obligations;
- make a decision on the return of funds from the guarantor.
Screenshots of the correspondence are attached. I am prepared to provide a full video recording of the correspondence as additional evidence if necessary.
According to the agreement, he agreed to transfer funds to the cards I provided, with the profit split 30% between me and 70% between him. He also specified that he would transfer an amount up to 40% of the deposit placed with the guarantor.
After I deposited 10,000 USDT with the guarantor, he informed me on Saturday that the workday was over and they were closed on Sunday, and they wouldn't be able to start until Monday. Today, when I announced I was ready to start working, he blocked me on Telegram and removed me from the group.
He then told the guarantor that the Telegram account specified in the terms and conditions didn't belong to him and that I had allegedly been communicating with a fake account. This statement is untrue.
If the said Telegram really did not belong to him, he was obliged to:
- Do not confirm the transaction.
- Request corrections before it is confirmed.
However, he officially confirmed the deal. Once confirmed, he assumes full responsibility for the contact information provided. Referring to a "fake account" after blocking and disclaiming obligations appears to be an attempt to evade the terms of the deal.
The fact that he was blocked, removed from the group, and refused to work confirms the dishonesty of his actions.
I request the arbitration court to:
- recognize the fact of the confirmed transaction;
- take into account the blocking and evasion of fulfillment of obligations;
- make a decision on the return of funds from the guarantor.
Screenshots of the correspondence are attached. I am prepared to provide a full video recording of the correspondence as additional evidence if necessary.
Чтобы видеть изображения, необходимо зарегистрироваться.
Чтобы видеть изображения, необходимо зарегистрироваться.
Чтобы видеть изображения, необходимо зарегистрироваться.
Чтобы видеть изображения, необходимо зарегистрироваться.
!
Автор объявления —
непроверенный пользователь
.
Используйте
гарант-сервис форума
,
чтобы избежать рисков.